"modest is hottest"
really?
then
why do men
still oogle over
boobs and
thighs,
midrifs and any form of
scandalous skin exposure?!
*there seems to be a disconnect in boys attitudes and actions *
i've never been dubbed as "risque" since i pride myself on keeping the skin decently covered.
but, may i point out, that
i have great legs.
people have said they would kill for these babies.
frankly, i don't see their appeal, but
the boys sure do like 'em.
i get comments when my jeans are tight or i'm out to sunbathe.
sometimes,
i just wanna show them off!
but... being
mormon, i sacrifice this desire. for
the greater good-- so men won't be tempted or something like that.
plus i "respect" my body.
men don't quite understand the inconvenience of modesty. when the dresses are too short and all the shirts too low, you must make do and improvise-- which typically is not the most fashionable.
sure, i could look like pamela anderson (minus the boobs) easily and for a whole lot less cash, but...
if you're not a slut, don't dress like a whore.
all my years i have been fed the potentially true line:
"modest is hottest".
now i really wonder, is it?
is modest hottest?
because, {as ali said}
"you never get compliments when you're wearing a cardigan"
..............................................................
think on that, for a while.
it would be so great if boys noticed modesty rather than spandex.
it would give more incentive to stay modest.
which leads to this
dilemma of mine:
what should i be for halloween?
because nothing is compatible with modesty. and this year, it might be nice to be noticed.
i'm thinking
this
or
this
or
this
or perhaps even
this.
it is even worth it to de-skankify the costumes?
not to worry,
i
will wear a shade shirt, leggings, or something to cover up the astronomical amount of skin that would show with any of those costumes, but still...
it makes me wonder if men actually appreciate modesty when they only notice the immodest.